A series of vote-catching measures planned by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as he braces for a difficult general election may cost more than 1 trillion rupees ($14 billion), two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said.
Much of the cost of the extra spending or revenue losses would have to be borne by the government that will take charge after the election due by May. The spending is also likely to delay plans to reduce the government’s budget deficit, a key indicator of the nation’s economic health.
Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost three major state elections at the end of last year, largely due to anger in rural India in the face of low crop prices and rising costs. Modi remains the front-runner for the general election, according to opinion polls, but his once-invincible image has been dealt a heavy blow.
The government is expected to unveil handouts mostly aimed at farmers in an interim budget to be presented on Feb. 1, said the sources, both government officials. While no final decisions have been taken, the measures could include direct transfers of funds into farmers’ bank accounts and interest-free loans for them.
The giveaways will come on top of tax sops, job reservations and policies favoring local businesses that have already been made public. The new measures have to be announced before election dates are finalised by the Election Commission, possibly in March or April, after which there will be curbs on policies that could influence voting.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Finance did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.
The BJP’s economic affairs spokesman, Gopal Krishna Agarwal, told Reuters this week that the party favored an expansionary economic policy that would give space to growth-boosting measures as inflation stays low.
The BJP also does not consider the finance ministry’s plan to keep the fiscal deficit to 3.3 percent of gross domestic product in the current April-March fiscal year as “sacrosanct”, he said, comments which pushed bond yields higher and hurt the rupee.
“Addressing farmer distress is the most important thing,” Agarwal told Reuters. “You need an expansionary policy. You chase growth in the economy, you do not chase these parameters like fiscal deficit.”
India’s federal fiscal deficit was 5.9 trillion rupees, or 3.5 percent of GDP, in the 2017-18 fiscal year.
Since the state election losses, Modi’s government has exempted many small businesses from paying taxes under a unified goods and services tax (GST), and is considering raising the income level at which people need to pay personal tax.
The government also plans to spend millions of dollars to add new seats in colleges and universities to accommodate a 10 percent quota announced recently for the less well-off among upper caste Hindus and people from other religions.
The Congress party, the main opposition, called it the reaction of a “panic-stricken” administration.
“Fearing an impending loss in the election, the government wants to bandage this crisis situation by giving interest-free loans and income-support schemes,” said Gourav Vallabh, a Congress spokesman. “Like all other schemes, this is a hurriedly prepared scheme by a panic-stricken Modi government.”
He said the countryside was in the throes of the “worst agrarian crisis in 20 years”, because of Modi’s shock ban on then existing high-denomination bank notes in 2016 and a chaotic implementation of the GST in 2017.
The interest-free loans for farmers, to be given by state banks who would be compensated by the government, could cost 120 billion rupees a year, the government sources told Reuters, declining to be identified as the discussions are not public.
“But this alone will not be enough,” said one of the sources. “We will need another 400 billion for various schemes that we need to top that with.”
They said the personal and commercial tax concessions could lead to a revenue loss of up to 250 billion rupees. This would include a proposed GST rate cut for cement to 18 percent from 28 percent that would lead to an annual revenue loss of 130 billion rupees.
The sources also said giving 2,000-4,000 rupees per hectare to land-owning farmers was another option being considered, which would be “costly but effective”.
That alone could cost more than 1 trillion rupees, they said, but if implemented, the government may not go for other measures like interest-free loans.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is likely to pay the government a dividend of up to 400 billion rupees by March, Reuters reported earlier this month citing sources, but that will far from make up the difference.
Moody’s Investors Service has already said India’s federal fiscal deficit target could slip to about 3.4 percent of GDP in the current fiscal year because of revenue shortfalls from GST collections, lower excise duty and below-target government asset sales.
Many Indian states have also let their financial discipline slip, especially around the time of elections, economists say.
Moody’s said India’s combined federal and state government fiscal deficit was about 6.6 percent of GDP in the last fiscal year, significantly higher than the median of 2.6 percent for countries that have India’s Baa rating.
“Increased expenditure on income transfers, farm loan waivers or other forms of subsidies would weigh further on government finances,” said William Foster, a vice president at Moody’s.
The government’s stated commitment is to bring down the fiscal deficit to 3.1 percent of GDP by the end of March 2020, and to 3 percent by March 2021. Those targets could now be delayed, the sources said.
Long seen as a Hindu nationalist party of the middle-class and traders, the BJP is increasingly adopting policies more associated with the left-of-center Congress.
Congress has ruled India for most of the more than 71 years since independence, and has been known for its subsidies, rural employment guarantee programs and a cheap food distribution scheme.
Since defeating the BJP in the heartland states of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh late last year, Congress has announced farm loan waivers in those states and has promised to do something similar across the country if voted back to power in the general election. It has also announced free housing and free food allowances for the poor, among other measures, in these states.
One of the government sources said the biggest financial impact of the federal government’s planned extra spending would be seen in the next fiscal year, which could mean missing the short-term fiscal deficit target of 3 percent of GDP by 2021.
But he said the government was not unduly worried about such a slippage given that its financial discipline has been very good over the past five years.
This person added that the government was also expecting a Reserve Bank of India panel, led by former Governor Bimal Jalan, to recommend a less-conservative contingency reserve for the central bank, which could free up trillions of rupees for government use in the next 2-3 years beginning next fiscal year. Jalan last week declined to comment on his panel’s planned recommendations.
“We can delay the medium-term fiscal targets since we have credibility with the target by a year or two and I don’t think markets should see this adversely,”